Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jan DAWE's avatar

THE U.S of A Criteria of Office = ANY /ALL Administrations, WITHOUT EXCEPTION! THERE ARE ZERO SECRETS FROM - 'WE THE PEOPLE', BUT, ALL PROTECTIONS OF 'WE THE PEOPLE' - THE U.S. CONSTITUTION - IS- 'WE THE PEOPLE'!

The No.1 Protector, & 'EMPLOYED' BY 'WE THE PEOPLE' IS, The President of The U.S.A. HIS/HER ALPHA RESPONSIBILITY IS - PROTECTION AND UPHOLDING OF THE 'CONSTITUTION'( A NON DISCUSSABLE /'Politically Shifting INTERPRETIVE' DOCUMENT,AND CONTRACT) , - AGAINST 'ANY THREAT' TO LIFE>LIBERTY & FREEDOMS OF 'WE THE PEOPLE' = FOREIGN AND 'DOMESTIC' - THUS BY CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT INCLUDES ROGUE AND THREATENING INTERNAL DOMESTIC THREATS TO SAID 'LIFE>LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS' OF 'WE THE PEOPLE' - READ; NOT 'WE THE GOVERMENT'- OR AGENCIES THEREIN NOR CORPORATIONS = ANY THREAT TO LIFE>LIBERTY & FREEDOMS!

President of U.S.A Swearing in OATH; “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

NEXT 'Credible' argument from THE 'SYSTEM'? AND, If the 'Judiciary' UPHOLDS THREATS TO LIFE>LIBERTY AND FREEDOMS OF 'WE THE PEOPLE'(Represented BY the Constitution) - NO MATTER THE 'SOURCE', THEN THAT JUDICIARY IS BY PLAIN REASONING, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION & A 'THREAT' TO SAME = FOREIGN AND 'DOMESTIC'!

Just an observation from West OZtopian CitiZen (Australia)

Wellness - JOHN D.

Expand full comment
Brian O’Neill's avatar

Why has no one brought a case against the cavalryman? I meab there’s plenty of verified r ide evidence to bring a Nuremberg trial case to them.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts