Your Credible Medical News Network - CMNnews - curated from Global sources - We roam the planet for the best medical news to bring to you - the Archive - https://cmnnews.substack.com/archive
It may possibly be useful for Jayden to be aware that, in September, 2021, I launched a legal challenge against the NT Chief Medical Officer, exploiting the Legal Aid Commission, pointing to how the mRNA mandate violated C S 51, The Privacy Act (1988), and the Nuremberg Code. I may have also mentioned that police repression of subsequent protests would be in violation of the Police Offences Act (1914). I added the bluff that the only legal consequence of breach of Nuremberg was execution.
The CMO, Hugh Crosby Heggie, on anecdotal report, had a mental breakdown and took leave for several months. A stand-in had more audacity and prosecuted the mandate, gleefully enforced by then Chief Minister Michael Gunner. With many Territorians being less conditioned by civil niceities, it was made clear to him that he was responsible for murder and destroyed lives and would be punished accordingly. Evidenty, some punishments were both severe and creative. Eventually, Gunner was reduced to making incoherent and nonsensiscal threats on NT ABC TV (of which his wife was a presenter), and he abruptly resigned.
His replacment was humiliated by a pie in the face; the wielder still facing disproportionate legal repucussions. Popular public sentiment reflects enthusiastic support for pies of more deterrant substance. Many citizens engaged in diligent research and proved the new Chief Ninister to be corrupt, forcing her resignation.
Heggie was rewarded with appointment as Administrator of the NT.
In the coming weeks, i will be returning to my home in Arnhem Land wherein my whereabouts are known only to local Aboriginal clans. Then being beyond practical harrassment, I will commence a campaign of approbrium against Heggie and Gunner.
I am also a member of the CLP, which will one day become an awkward impasse when it comes to prosecuting me. Meanwhile, a clique of business people used the courts with the same intent, to no avail.
I hope the context is of strategic and morale purposes value. As an age pensioner, i cannot assist with $.
Surprising me, there were a half a dozrn likes, so if anyone seeks more information this can be found on "Australia Fights Back" on URL oziz4oziz.com/ or in SUBSTACK oziz4oziz
This was published today: Unveiling hidden biases that inflated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety
How misclassification of early post-vaccination deaths distorts mortality rates and public health assessments
Panagis Polykretis
Nov 9
Today, together with Dr. Marco Alessandria, Dr. Giovanni Trambusti, Dr. Giovanni M. Malatesta, and Dr. Alberto Donzelli, we published an crucial peer-reviewed scientific study titled “Classification bias and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on all-cause mortality: the case of the Italian Region Emilia-Romagna” [1]. In this study, we provide the first peer-reviewed evidence, based on real-world data, demonstrating how certain statistical methods have led to an overestimation of the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. This paper will shock the world, because it proves that all scientific studies conducted so far that are affected by this bias should be reassessed.
We addressed a critical bias that can substantially distort real-world evaluations of vaccine effectiveness and safety, known as the “case-counting window bias”. This bias, theorized by Fung et al. [2], occurs because individuals are classified as “unvaccinated” during the first 14 days after receiving the vaccine (the period believed necessary for the immune response to develop fully). As a result, any adverse events, including deaths during this time, are incorrectly attributed to the unvaccinated group, artificially inflating its mortality rate, while simultaneously underestimating mortality among vaccinated individuals.
By analyzing detailed daily data on all-cause mortality and vaccine administration in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy), obtained through a FOIA request by lawyer Lorenzo Melacarne (in accordance with the art. 5, comma 2 of the Italian Legislative Decree No. 33/2013), we found a clear temporal coincidence between vaccination campaigns and spikes in deaths among those incorrectly classified as unvaccinated during this critical window (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The chart illustrates the daily mortality rate per 100,000 individuals (age group 70-79), comparing those vaccinated (represented by the solid red line) with those unvaccinated (shown by the solid green line). Additionally, it shows the cumulative number of vaccinations administered with at least one dose (indicated by the red dotted line) [taken from Alessandria et al., 2025].
Our statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences in mortality between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, during the critical 14-day post-vaccination window when misclassification occurs. Importantly, these mortality differences cannot be explained solely by COVID-19 deaths, which accounted for only about 9% of all deaths in Italy in 2021. Even after excluding COVID-19-related deaths, the disparity between groups remained significant, indicating systematic misclassification rather than true vaccine benefit. We also observed that the difference diminished with age, likely reflecting the increased comorbidity burden in older individuals that influences overall mortality risk (for more detailed information, please see the article, which is published in open access format and freely available to everyone).
Our findings suggest a harvesting effect, whereby vulnerable individuals succumb shortly after vaccination, but their deaths are wrongly counted among the unvaccinated. This misclassification masks potential serious vaccine-related adverse events occurring shortly post-vaccination, such as severe allergic reactions, cardiovascular events, or autoimmune responses.
Moreover, the use of similar classification practices by many countries, including the United Kingdom, suggests that this bias is widespread internationally. For example, UK public health guidelines classify individuals as unvaccinated for 14 to 21 days following vaccination, which leads to the misattribution of early adverse events.
It is crucial to recognize that the case-counting window bias is related to another well-established phenomenon in observational research known as the immortal time bias. Prof. Norman Fenton and Prof. Martin Neil were among the first to identify how these biases shift cases and deaths in a manner that exaggerates the apparent efficacy and safety of vaccines by creating misleading temporal categorizations. Prof. Fenton himself has referred to such manipulations as a “cheap trick” — a statistical illusion that artificially enhances perceived vaccine effectiveness [3]. Moreover, James Lyons-Weiler, PhD had already identified and highlighted this significant statistical inconsistency affecting vaccine efficacy data as early as October 2021, underscoring the need for critical scrutiny of how vaccination status and case counting windows distort perceived vaccine performance [4].
Our findings have important implications: failing to account for these biases can lead to substantial overestimation of vaccine benefits and safety, resulting in misguided public health policies. Therefore, the scientific community must recognize and adjust for these biases to produce more accurate and transparent assessments of vaccine risks and benefits.
In conclusion, our study shows that the case-counting window bias inflates mortality rates wrongly attributed to the unvaccinated, while simultaneously underestimating adverse reactions occurring shortly after vaccination. To ensure reliable interpretation of observational vaccine studies and informed public health decisions, it is crucial to correct this bias alongside the immortal time bias. Furthermore, all existing vaccine effectiveness studies should be reassessed for these biases. A key part of this process is having accurate and timely data on individuals’ vaccination status, which allows proper classification of cases and deaths and supports a more reliable evaluation of vaccine safety and effectiveness in real-world settings.
References
[1] M. Alessandria, G. Trambusti, G.M. Malatesta, P. Polykretis, A. Donzelli, Classification bias and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on all-cause mortality: the case of the Italian region Emilia-Romagna, Autoimmunity 58 (2025) 2562972. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916934.2025.2562972.
[2] K. Fung, M. Jones, P. Doshi, Sources of bias in observational studies of covid-19 vaccine effectiveness, J Eval Clin Pract 30 (2024) 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13839.
This was published just recently: As reported in 1819 News, on Monday, July 14 2025, Senator Tuberville spoke to the Alabama Grocers Association about the financial difficulties the country faces. Following his remarks about the U.S. government’s enormous deficit spending, he mentioned the COVID-19 pandemic
Covid absolutely destroyed our country, and we allowed it to happen through federal regulations and shutting down schools, nobody going to work, our health care went to hell in a handbasket. It was devastating, and where did it start?
It started in North Carolina. They shipped it to Wuhan, China. They released it there, and look what happened? At the end of the day, you're going to find out, and of course, everybody said this was a conspiracy theory: it was done on purpose. Made us all sick. It wasn't as bad physically for those of us that didn't have bad health problems. If you had a bad health problem, you really struggled with it, but when POTUS 45 was in.
America held The Covid-19 virus in a Level 4 Bio Lab from 2013 to 2019, but for 6 years, in North Carolina before releasing it in Wuhan, China, as a Military Project, at the Military Games there, where 100 Countries sent their Military Athletes to compete (according to a document suppressed by Biden, released in 2025) and that is how the virus was spread around the world by America as a Military Operation - Servicemembers were deployed to conduct mass murder faked as a "public health emergency". Now they might be for sale. That said, adding up the best official figures that can be found (by Chat GPT and other internet searches) yields a conservative estimate of approximately 600,000 - 800,000 military personnel deployed worldwide by the end of 2020. The true cumulative headcount was almost certainly higher Covid-19 wasn’t a “mismanaged public health crisis”. It was and remains a war. Sasha Latypova 27.10.2025 and Senator Tuberville 1819 News on Monday, July 14 2025 and the vaccines which in America, POTUS 45 released after he used the Prep Act at least 10 times, to force his vaccines onto America and the World at the same time as Tedos in Europe and AUKUS for England, Australia and America and Albert Bourla said in a statement that Operation Warp Speed and the development of COVID-19 vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna “is a profound public health achievement” (It was and remains a war, as above) that was achieved under the leadership of Trump during the president’s first term - by Zachary Stieber Senior Reporter 9/3/2025 Epoch Times
You will recall that in America, those who refused to be vaccinated, in the Armed Forces, were removed and returned to Civvy Street.......
Former CDC Director States that the COVID-19 Pandemic Was a Self-Spreading Nanoparticles Vaccine
HHS, FDA and CDC insiders are finally coming forward with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth regarding all things COVID-19. TRUTH WINS.
Karen Kingston
Nov 7
October 6, 2025: HHS, FDA and CDC insiders are finally coming forward with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth regarding all things COVID-19.
The SARS-2 Virus Was a ‘Global Vaccination Program’
In a jaw-dropping interview with Dana Parish from Third Opinion, former CDC Director under the 1st Trump Administration, Dr. Robert Redfield, openly expresses his expert opinion that the entire COVID-19 program was designed to make, “a self-spreading, aerosolized respiratory transmitted vaccine.”
The “COVID-19 self-spreading vaccine program,” is comprised of all the man-made mRNA nanoparticle virus-vaccines that can be spread via aerosol attack, food or surface contamination and injection, as was described in detail in EcoHealth Alliance’s 2018 DEFUSE pitch to DARPA.
COVID-19 is Aerosolized Self-Spreading mRNA Nanoparticles
In the 2023 film Final Days, I explain in great detail how COVID was aerosolized mRNA nanoparticle technology per the EcoHealth Pitch and lectures given buy Professor James Giordano.
But don’t take my word for it, listen to words of former CDC Director, Dr. Robert Redfield.
“My own personal opinion was the entire program (COVID) was designed to make a vaccine, a vaccine vector that could be used as a vaccine for a variety of different antigens, including COVID, but also including everything else, as a self-spreading, aerosolized respiratory transmitted vaccine.” - Dr. Robert Redfield
“I talked to several virologists and other people. This (Omicron variant) was created, this was released as a self-spreading vaccine. yeah….you needed the virus to evolve to a vaccine that didn’t cause much illness. Okay. And that’s what happened with Omicron.
You also needed it to change where it replicated, if you want the virus to be spread........ "It’s a lot easier to spread a virus that replicates in the upper throat"......... then one that replicates in the lower lung. So, there are some people that believe that this was part of creating a vaccine vector.”
Redfield States That There’s Clear Data that the Chinese Were Working on a COVID Vaccine, aka The COVID Pandemic
“I think there’s pretty clear data that the Chinese were working on a COVID vaccine. probably before the COVID pandemic started, right?” - Dr. Robert Redfield
It’s not breaking news to the alternative media that the Chinese government has been working with US federal healthcare agencies and BioPharma research organizations on developing infectious, disease-causing biosynthetic pathogens using gain-of-function technology, including mRNA nanoparticle technology, for decades.
We know from the 2018 DARPA pitch and peer-reviewed publications that former NIAID Director Tony Fauci, the NIH, Ralph Baric, and EcoHealth Alliance were working on creating a ‘biosynthetic virus-vaccine’ using recombinant multi-species (chimeric) DNA spike proteins (mRNA) encapsulated in nanoparticle technology - aka vaccine nanotechnology.
Please keep in mind, that the higher-ups at some federal agencies and BioPharma organizations use the terms vaccines, viruses, spike proteins, recombinant DNA, gain-of-function viruses, mRNA, nanoparticle technology and bioweapons interchangeably, as they are all considered as dual-use technologies.
New NIAID Director Resurrects Deadly 1918 Flu Virus
During the interview, Dana Parish also asked Dr. Redfield what he thought of the new NIAID Director, Jeffrey Taubenberger, who many say is almost exactly like Fauci. Taubenberger conducted gain-of-function research to resurrect the deadly 1918 flu virus. Redfield responded by saying that he believes there should be a moratorium on gain-of-function research (which includes mRNA nanoparticle technology) and that Taubenberger has been careless.
COVID-19 mRNA Must Be Recalled
Redfield also emphasizes that the COVID-19 mRNA injections should be recalled immediately and that the FDA must come clean with all the injuries, diseases and deaths that they have caused.
Ninth Circuit Court Rules Correctly COVID-19 mRNA Injections Are Not Legitimate State Interest Due To Being A Treatment, Not A Preventative | This Is All We Need To DESTROY WHO & FDA
It may possibly be useful for Jayden to be aware that, in September, 2021, I launched a legal challenge against the NT Chief Medical Officer, exploiting the Legal Aid Commission, pointing to how the mRNA mandate violated C S 51, The Privacy Act (1988), and the Nuremberg Code. I may have also mentioned that police repression of subsequent protests would be in violation of the Police Offences Act (1914). I added the bluff that the only legal consequence of breach of Nuremberg was execution.
The CMO, Hugh Crosby Heggie, on anecdotal report, had a mental breakdown and took leave for several months. A stand-in had more audacity and prosecuted the mandate, gleefully enforced by then Chief Minister Michael Gunner. With many Territorians being less conditioned by civil niceities, it was made clear to him that he was responsible for murder and destroyed lives and would be punished accordingly. Evidenty, some punishments were both severe and creative. Eventually, Gunner was reduced to making incoherent and nonsensiscal threats on NT ABC TV (of which his wife was a presenter), and he abruptly resigned.
His replacment was humiliated by a pie in the face; the wielder still facing disproportionate legal repucussions. Popular public sentiment reflects enthusiastic support for pies of more deterrant substance. Many citizens engaged in diligent research and proved the new Chief Ninister to be corrupt, forcing her resignation.
Heggie was rewarded with appointment as Administrator of the NT.
In the coming weeks, i will be returning to my home in Arnhem Land wherein my whereabouts are known only to local Aboriginal clans. Then being beyond practical harrassment, I will commence a campaign of approbrium against Heggie and Gunner.
I am also a member of the CLP, which will one day become an awkward impasse when it comes to prosecuting me. Meanwhile, a clique of business people used the courts with the same intent, to no avail.
I hope the context is of strategic and morale purposes value. As an age pensioner, i cannot assist with $.
Surprising me, there were a half a dozrn likes, so if anyone seeks more information this can be found on "Australia Fights Back" on URL oziz4oziz.com/ or in SUBSTACK oziz4oziz
This was published today: Unveiling hidden biases that inflated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety
How misclassification of early post-vaccination deaths distorts mortality rates and public health assessments
Panagis Polykretis
Nov 9
Today, together with Dr. Marco Alessandria, Dr. Giovanni Trambusti, Dr. Giovanni M. Malatesta, and Dr. Alberto Donzelli, we published an crucial peer-reviewed scientific study titled “Classification bias and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on all-cause mortality: the case of the Italian Region Emilia-Romagna” [1]. In this study, we provide the first peer-reviewed evidence, based on real-world data, demonstrating how certain statistical methods have led to an overestimation of the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. This paper will shock the world, because it proves that all scientific studies conducted so far that are affected by this bias should be reassessed.
We addressed a critical bias that can substantially distort real-world evaluations of vaccine effectiveness and safety, known as the “case-counting window bias”. This bias, theorized by Fung et al. [2], occurs because individuals are classified as “unvaccinated” during the first 14 days after receiving the vaccine (the period believed necessary for the immune response to develop fully). As a result, any adverse events, including deaths during this time, are incorrectly attributed to the unvaccinated group, artificially inflating its mortality rate, while simultaneously underestimating mortality among vaccinated individuals.
By analyzing detailed daily data on all-cause mortality and vaccine administration in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy), obtained through a FOIA request by lawyer Lorenzo Melacarne (in accordance with the art. 5, comma 2 of the Italian Legislative Decree No. 33/2013), we found a clear temporal coincidence between vaccination campaigns and spikes in deaths among those incorrectly classified as unvaccinated during this critical window (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The chart illustrates the daily mortality rate per 100,000 individuals (age group 70-79), comparing those vaccinated (represented by the solid red line) with those unvaccinated (shown by the solid green line). Additionally, it shows the cumulative number of vaccinations administered with at least one dose (indicated by the red dotted line) [taken from Alessandria et al., 2025].
Our statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences in mortality between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, during the critical 14-day post-vaccination window when misclassification occurs. Importantly, these mortality differences cannot be explained solely by COVID-19 deaths, which accounted for only about 9% of all deaths in Italy in 2021. Even after excluding COVID-19-related deaths, the disparity between groups remained significant, indicating systematic misclassification rather than true vaccine benefit. We also observed that the difference diminished with age, likely reflecting the increased comorbidity burden in older individuals that influences overall mortality risk (for more detailed information, please see the article, which is published in open access format and freely available to everyone).
Our findings suggest a harvesting effect, whereby vulnerable individuals succumb shortly after vaccination, but their deaths are wrongly counted among the unvaccinated. This misclassification masks potential serious vaccine-related adverse events occurring shortly post-vaccination, such as severe allergic reactions, cardiovascular events, or autoimmune responses.
Moreover, the use of similar classification practices by many countries, including the United Kingdom, suggests that this bias is widespread internationally. For example, UK public health guidelines classify individuals as unvaccinated for 14 to 21 days following vaccination, which leads to the misattribution of early adverse events.
It is crucial to recognize that the case-counting window bias is related to another well-established phenomenon in observational research known as the immortal time bias. Prof. Norman Fenton and Prof. Martin Neil were among the first to identify how these biases shift cases and deaths in a manner that exaggerates the apparent efficacy and safety of vaccines by creating misleading temporal categorizations. Prof. Fenton himself has referred to such manipulations as a “cheap trick” — a statistical illusion that artificially enhances perceived vaccine effectiveness [3]. Moreover, James Lyons-Weiler, PhD had already identified and highlighted this significant statistical inconsistency affecting vaccine efficacy data as early as October 2021, underscoring the need for critical scrutiny of how vaccination status and case counting windows distort perceived vaccine performance [4].
Our findings have important implications: failing to account for these biases can lead to substantial overestimation of vaccine benefits and safety, resulting in misguided public health policies. Therefore, the scientific community must recognize and adjust for these biases to produce more accurate and transparent assessments of vaccine risks and benefits.
In conclusion, our study shows that the case-counting window bias inflates mortality rates wrongly attributed to the unvaccinated, while simultaneously underestimating adverse reactions occurring shortly after vaccination. To ensure reliable interpretation of observational vaccine studies and informed public health decisions, it is crucial to correct this bias alongside the immortal time bias. Furthermore, all existing vaccine effectiveness studies should be reassessed for these biases. A key part of this process is having accurate and timely data on individuals’ vaccination status, which allows proper classification of cases and deaths and supports a more reliable evaluation of vaccine safety and effectiveness in real-world settings.
References
[1] M. Alessandria, G. Trambusti, G.M. Malatesta, P. Polykretis, A. Donzelli, Classification bias and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on all-cause mortality: the case of the Italian region Emilia-Romagna, Autoimmunity 58 (2025) 2562972. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916934.2025.2562972.
[2] K. Fung, M. Jones, P. Doshi, Sources of bias in observational studies of covid-19 vaccine effectiveness, J Eval Clin Pract 30 (2024) 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13839.
[3] N. Fenton, M. Neil, Vaccine efficacy “cheap trick” by exclusion, Where Are the Numbers? By Norman Fenton and Martin Neil (2023). https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/vaccine-efficacy-cheap-trick-by-exclusion.
[4] J.L.-W. PhD, How The Definition of “Fully Vaccinated” Misleads People on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety & Efficacy: An Explanation For CNN’s Drew Griffin, Popular Rationalism (2021). https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/how-the-definition-of-fully-vaccinated.
This was published just recently: As reported in 1819 News, on Monday, July 14 2025, Senator Tuberville spoke to the Alabama Grocers Association about the financial difficulties the country faces. Following his remarks about the U.S. government’s enormous deficit spending, he mentioned the COVID-19 pandemic
Covid absolutely destroyed our country, and we allowed it to happen through federal regulations and shutting down schools, nobody going to work, our health care went to hell in a handbasket. It was devastating, and where did it start?
It started in North Carolina. They shipped it to Wuhan, China. They released it there, and look what happened? At the end of the day, you're going to find out, and of course, everybody said this was a conspiracy theory: it was done on purpose. Made us all sick. It wasn't as bad physically for those of us that didn't have bad health problems. If you had a bad health problem, you really struggled with it, but when POTUS 45 was in.
America held The Covid-19 virus in a Level 4 Bio Lab from 2013 to 2019, but for 6 years, in North Carolina before releasing it in Wuhan, China, as a Military Project, at the Military Games there, where 100 Countries sent their Military Athletes to compete (according to a document suppressed by Biden, released in 2025) and that is how the virus was spread around the world by America as a Military Operation - Servicemembers were deployed to conduct mass murder faked as a "public health emergency". Now they might be for sale. That said, adding up the best official figures that can be found (by Chat GPT and other internet searches) yields a conservative estimate of approximately 600,000 - 800,000 military personnel deployed worldwide by the end of 2020. The true cumulative headcount was almost certainly higher Covid-19 wasn’t a “mismanaged public health crisis”. It was and remains a war. Sasha Latypova 27.10.2025 and Senator Tuberville 1819 News on Monday, July 14 2025 and the vaccines which in America, POTUS 45 released after he used the Prep Act at least 10 times, to force his vaccines onto America and the World at the same time as Tedos in Europe and AUKUS for England, Australia and America and Albert Bourla said in a statement that Operation Warp Speed and the development of COVID-19 vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna “is a profound public health achievement” (It was and remains a war, as above) that was achieved under the leadership of Trump during the president’s first term - by Zachary Stieber Senior Reporter 9/3/2025 Epoch Times
You will recall that in America, those who refused to be vaccinated, in the Armed Forces, were removed and returned to Civvy Street.......
Former CDC Director States that the COVID-19 Pandemic Was a Self-Spreading Nanoparticles Vaccine
HHS, FDA and CDC insiders are finally coming forward with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth regarding all things COVID-19. TRUTH WINS.
Karen Kingston
Nov 7
October 6, 2025: HHS, FDA and CDC insiders are finally coming forward with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth regarding all things COVID-19.
The SARS-2 Virus Was a ‘Global Vaccination Program’
In a jaw-dropping interview with Dana Parish from Third Opinion, former CDC Director under the 1st Trump Administration, Dr. Robert Redfield, openly expresses his expert opinion that the entire COVID-19 program was designed to make, “a self-spreading, aerosolized respiratory transmitted vaccine.”
The “COVID-19 self-spreading vaccine program,” is comprised of all the man-made mRNA nanoparticle virus-vaccines that can be spread via aerosol attack, food or surface contamination and injection, as was described in detail in EcoHealth Alliance’s 2018 DEFUSE pitch to DARPA.
COVID-19 is Aerosolized Self-Spreading mRNA Nanoparticles
In the 2023 film Final Days, I explain in great detail how COVID was aerosolized mRNA nanoparticle technology per the EcoHealth Pitch and lectures given buy Professor James Giordano.
But don’t take my word for it, listen to words of former CDC Director, Dr. Robert Redfield.
“My own personal opinion was the entire program (COVID) was designed to make a vaccine, a vaccine vector that could be used as a vaccine for a variety of different antigens, including COVID, but also including everything else, as a self-spreading, aerosolized respiratory transmitted vaccine.” - Dr. Robert Redfield
“I talked to several virologists and other people. This (Omicron variant) was created, this was released as a self-spreading vaccine. yeah….you needed the virus to evolve to a vaccine that didn’t cause much illness. Okay. And that’s what happened with Omicron.
https://substack.com/redirect/75016ee5-2767-4c38-b1c4-6b51023a7416?j=eyJ1IjoiNHJpanFkIn0.XkByYkhdfak5ZGBNvrvd_V3z8cWMZXPD5Nz7AjmvHCM
You also needed it to change where it replicated, if you want the virus to be spread........ "It’s a lot easier to spread a virus that replicates in the upper throat"......... then one that replicates in the lower lung. So, there are some people that believe that this was part of creating a vaccine vector.”
Redfield States That There’s Clear Data that the Chinese Were Working on a COVID Vaccine, aka The COVID Pandemic
“I think there’s pretty clear data that the Chinese were working on a COVID vaccine. probably before the COVID pandemic started, right?” - Dr. Robert Redfield
It’s not breaking news to the alternative media that the Chinese government has been working with US federal healthcare agencies and BioPharma research organizations on developing infectious, disease-causing biosynthetic pathogens using gain-of-function technology, including mRNA nanoparticle technology, for decades.
We know from the 2018 DARPA pitch and peer-reviewed publications that former NIAID Director Tony Fauci, the NIH, Ralph Baric, and EcoHealth Alliance were working on creating a ‘biosynthetic virus-vaccine’ using recombinant multi-species (chimeric) DNA spike proteins (mRNA) encapsulated in nanoparticle technology - aka vaccine nanotechnology.
Please keep in mind, that the higher-ups at some federal agencies and BioPharma organizations use the terms vaccines, viruses, spike proteins, recombinant DNA, gain-of-function viruses, mRNA, nanoparticle technology and bioweapons interchangeably, as they are all considered as dual-use technologies.
New NIAID Director Resurrects Deadly 1918 Flu Virus
During the interview, Dana Parish also asked Dr. Redfield what he thought of the new NIAID Director, Jeffrey Taubenberger, who many say is almost exactly like Fauci. Taubenberger conducted gain-of-function research to resurrect the deadly 1918 flu virus. Redfield responded by saying that he believes there should be a moratorium on gain-of-function research (which includes mRNA nanoparticle technology) and that Taubenberger has been careless.
COVID-19 mRNA Must Be Recalled
Redfield also emphasizes that the COVID-19 mRNA injections should be recalled immediately and that the FDA must come clean with all the injuries, diseases and deaths that they have caused.
Donated. Hopefully the case will be won.
https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/ninth-circuit-court-rules-correctly
Ninth Circuit Court Rules Correctly COVID-19 mRNA Injections Are Not Legitimate State Interest Due To Being A Treatment, Not A Preventative | This Is All We Need To DESTROY WHO & FDA